The Supreme Court Library will be closed Monday 12 June for the public holiday. It reopens Tuesday 13 June at 8.30am.
- Library Services
- Visit the Library
- Events and Training
- The Collection
- Understanding the Law
- About Us
In the matter of an application pursuant to section 84 of the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) for the modification of a restrictive covenant imposed by Instrument of Transfer AK036535Y registered in the Register Book at the Office of Titles and on Certificate of Title Volume 11384 Folio 290; ROJ Property Group P/L & K & M Property Investments Group P/L v Eventpower Property P/L (Costs)
COSTS - Application for modification of restrictive covenant - Application granted - Whether the defendant should pay plaintiffs' costs - Whether defendant's conduct of the case irresponsible - Whether defendant made groundless objections to the application - Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 84 - Re Withers  VR 319; Stanhill Pty Ltd v Jackson  VSC 355; Walker v Bridgewood (No 2)  NSWSC 284; Mamfredas Investment Group Pty Ltd v PropertyIT and Consulting Pty Limited  NSWSC 929; Wong v McConville (No 2)  VSC 282; Jiang v Monaygon Pty Ltd (Costs)  VSC 655 - Calderbank offer made by plaintiffs - Applicable legal principles - Whether unreasonable of defendant to reject Calderbank offer - Lahanis v Livesay (2021) 63 VR 197.