The Law Library of Victoria service is totally digital while the Supreme Court Library is temporarily closed. Enjoy photos of the grand space under the dome by following us on Instagram @lawlibraryvic
- Library Services
Director of Public Prosecutions [DPP] v Polat, Tarkan (a pseudonym)
CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Sentence - Crown appeal - Incest (four charges), sexual penetration of child under 16 - Sentence of 6 years' imprisonment on each incest charge - Cumulation of 9 months of each sentence - Total effective sentence 9 years and 3 months' imprisonment, non-parole period 6 years - No challenge to individual sentences - Whether orders for cumulation resulted in inadequate total effective sentence and non-parole period - Objectively serious offending - Breach of trust, abuse of parental authority - Psychological manipulation - Offending persisted over long period - Increased culpability with successive offences - Respondent sentenced as serious sexual offender on two incest charges - Presumption of cumulation - Whether orders for cumulation reflected separate criminality of individual offences - Appeal allowed - Orders for cumulation set aside - Resentenced to 12 years and 6 months' imprisonment, non-parole period 9 years - Sentencing Act 1991 ss 6D, 6E.